Some reflections on a subset of this year’s slate. Telluride once again flexes it’s high altitude muscle. With 27 features films as opposed to Toronto’s 400, it’s much easier for the cream to rise to the top.
The Past (Le Passe). Even a cursory plot summary of this movie would amount to a spoiler – the story is not just about what unfolds, but what you feel in the unfolding. By Iranian Director Asgar Farhadi (A Separation), it begins as a story of an Iranian man who returns to Paris to finalize a divorce from his ex-wife. As the narrative steps forward, new details are revealed such that moment to moment it becomes a different movie from the one you thought you were watching. The protagonist who initially appears to be callous and irritable, discloses maturity and prescience as a disrupted family situation and blistering reality comes into focus. Don’t be surprised to see it as an Oscar foreign film contender. US release date in December.
Under the Skin: Pygmalion. Bride of Frankenstein. Seventeen years in development before it received the green light. Never have I seen Scarlett Johanssen so naked and cared so little. Other people naked. I want my two hours back. Ducks performing Othello. Voice dub by Mel Blanc. Will play well in Venice. But not at the Palm. In Scottish. Like Macbeth. Except it needs subtitles. Do they even speak English? I don’t mind working. Alien. But not for so little. Tarkovsky. No. Scratch that. He had deep Russian monologues. Fast motorcycles. Tin Man seeks a heart. Except in the Wiz you had Dorothy. A family drowns. Dystopian. Never Let Me Go. No. That was engaging. This: black succubus. The Horror! The Horror! Like that sex addict movie. But more excruciating. And dull. I like the scene after the soccer match.
The worst cowboy movie I’ve ever seen.
Vespucci Studios lives. But now they have a budget.
The Lunchbox (Dabba): In Mumbai a network of more than 5000 dabbawallahs deliver home cooked lunches from Indian housewives to their husband’s offices, and then later return the lunch boxes back to the appropriate home. The lunch boxes change hands many times as they travel by bike and train and porter to the warren of office buildings that lace Mumbai. Largely illiterate, the dabbawallahs rely on a complex language of colors and symbols to ensure the lunch pails arrive on time at the appointed place. A team from the Harvard Business School found the system to be highly efficient – only one in eight million lunch boxes arrive at the wrong location.
This story is about one lunchbox that get’s misdelivered. Instead of arriving at the desk of her inattentive husband, Ila’s sumptuous meal is delivered to the desk of Sajaan, a lonely widower. Food is consumed, notes are delivered, and a surreptitious love affair blossoms.
Throughout, the ebb and flow of relationship is governed by the pulsing roar of the Mumbai transportation system, the frayed edges of an evolving city drowning in it’s own growth and decay. The loneliness and alienation of it’s inhabitants are mirrored by the uncountable lunch pails carried blindly through the maze of streets and alleys. What are the chances of intersecting with the right person and finding true love? And perhaps the wrong train that will deliver us to the right station.
As visually sumptuous as Ila’s cooking, the story remains emotionally restrained as Sajaan’s guarded expressions. But as the narrative builds, we see both characters relax into themselves and find the emotions they’ve long since buried. Without the polished arc of Monsoon Wedding or neat ending of Slumdogs, this story hovers a little closer to the grit and mud on the ground, and the very real messiness of our life choices. And it affords a chance to be a voyeur on the streets of Mumbai to boot. Delightfully sad and a crowd pleaser. Look for it’s North American release on September 20th.
Gravity: Although it will be hitting the theatres in wide release on October 4, the movie gave the TFF folks a chance to put the new Werner Herzog theatre sound system and 3D projection through it’s paces. And how was it? The Zog, assembled in the town park ice rink, blows away the competition.
From the first moment we delight in watching an extended sequence of George Clooney and Sandra Bullock floating in space as they complete repairs on the Hubble Space telescope. When disaster hits, Bullock and Clooney (looking ever more like Buzz Lightyear) are left floating in space like a bit of cosmic debris. Against all odds they must find their way home.
You’re only a few minutes into the movie before you suddenly wonder, how in God’s name did they film this? For 91 minutes astronauts float about in zero g’s. And it feels real, perhaps the best tribute to the film’s greatness. In Gravity, director Alberto Cuaron (Y Tu Mama Tambien) veers away from his terrestrial and more character driven stories into an extraterrestrial minimalism. He and his team labored for more than four years to develop the technology needed to recreate the clear light of space and what appears to be a zero gravity environment. And it does what movies are supposed to do – bumps the pulse and make you feel wonder.
Cuaron casts a vision of human experience that includes the exosphere of our planet. We feel the oblique loneliness that our descendants will carry as they chart a course ever deeper into the terra incognita of space, and away from terra firma. And you realize that yes, indeed, we at last are living in the 21st century.
Here Be Dragons: I mention because it’s classic Telluride Backlot fare. Shot with a flip cam for less than $3000, filmmaker Mark Cousins presents a film essay chronicling a trip to Albania to consult on the preservation of the Albanian film archive. Living under wraps for fifty years, the Balkan headlands of Albania may be the last place on earth for which we have few visuals. Cousins now supplies them. And his associative mind lends meaning to the starkness.
Nebraska: This one turned out to be the biggest show stopper this weekend. Following his success with The Descendants, Alexander Payne has committed to becoming a regular at Telluride. His delicate and human touch make him a nice fit. When Woody Grant (Bruce Dern) receives a letter in the mail informing him that he may have won a million dollar sweepstakes, he sets off to Nebraska to claim it. His youngest son aids and abets him and a family locked in its dysfunctional dynamic is splayed open.
Grant returns home, he connects with his old friends, and his life time of low grade trauma is replayed for him as relatives and friends are revealed for who they are. In this, he and his son find their own redemption.
When Bona Fide productions received the screenplay from first time writer, Bob Nelson, they asked Payne to step in as executive producer, but he said he wanted to direct instead. Payne, himself a Nebraska resident, relied on open casting to give these midwestern characters a some flesh. These are understated people eking out livings in an understated world.
Another Oscar contender. At the tail end of his career, Bruce Dern should be up for a nomination. A moving must see when it’s released later this year.
12 Years a Slave: The LA Times gave five reasons to see McQueen’s latest. Without knowing theirs, mine might include Fassbender’s performance. Brad Pitt taking a moral high ground. Paul Giamatti doing anything in the 19th century. And the 19th century articulated sentence structure. Beyond that, I’m an outlier amidst the rave response to 12 Years. What more does it add to the slave narrative, other than the slight nuance of an educated free black man being abducted and placed in chains in the deep South? Not much in the way of character development, beyond the protagonist shifting his forthright voice and gaze to one of subservience, leaving the affair somewhat cartoonish. And don’t we already know about the depravity, the ways in which slavery dehumanized all participants, and the ongoing effects of the lash?
Which raises a difficult aspect. The graphic violence, I assume, is intended to galvanize audience emotion. Except that in today’s cinema graphic violence comes easy. For me it amounted to a cheap thrill not dissimilar to the cheap (and very different) thrill that the slave owner gained by whipping his property. Rife with great performance, the film depicts brutality, but not much more than that.
Slow Food Story: If you’re a foodie, I’d give it a must see. A fresh addition to the heavy morass of many foodie documentaries (e.g. Food Inc.) Filmed almost exclusively in Bra and Northern Italy, the playful flick lays out the origins of the Slow Food movement and it’s joyful, extroverted founder, Carlo Petrini, considered by some to be one of the most transformative persons on the planet. You can’t help but love this man who dreamt big as a young man, got involved in Italian leftist politics, infused his work with the social goof of the Italian street theatre, and realized that the politics of the mind would have a far lesser effect than politics of the stomach. Before we had ideas manifestos, we broke bread. The film transects this new world we’re creating of urban gardens, and White House gardens, and food once again sourced from the ground on which we walk.
First time director Stefano Sardo does a delightful job of creating something uniquely italian – part cartoon, part street grotesque, but vivacious and animated. This is not so much about a movement, but about life itself.